I never have all the answers. My best thoughts come from reflection and collaboration with others. I look forward to reading other responses to this week's IMMOOC blog prompt: How might we measure the impact of innovative practices in education?
To understand "impact," we first must understand and define conceptually and operationally what innovative practices are. This could be a dissertation topic. However, here's an attempt that is not a comprehensive explanation as much as it is a brainstorming start and compilation of resources.
Innovation is the final outcome and includes evolving and changing for the better which means environments, assessments, and education are no longer traditional. They are transformational. The Florida TIM (Technology Integration Matrix) and the Communication By Design's version of ITM (Instructional transformation matrix) illustrates the continuum and shifts. Danielson's framework also assesses the shifts as her highest teacher rating come from the student involvement.
- Maker Movement
- Inquiry-Based Techniques
- Collaborative Teacher Network
- Flipped Instruction
- Real-World Project-Based Learning
- Professional Community Experts
- Passions
- Students are able to apply the learning.
- Students receive feedback (preferably from multiple parties).
- Students become sophisticated knowers.
- Learning is interpersonal for the students.
- Students are actively involved in their learning.
- Teachers also demonstrate that they are learners.
- Teachers coach students.
- Students understand characteristics of excellent work.
- Students integrate both general and subject-based skills.
- Teachers intertwine teaching and assessing.
1. CREATIVITY & INNOVATION
- Classroom Design
- Technology Integration
- Student-Centered Approaches
- Project-Based Learning
2. CRITICAL THINKING & PROBLEM SOLVING
- Inquiry-Based Projects
- Student Reflection
- PTM
- Self and Peer Assessment
3. COMMUNICATION & COLLABORATION
- PTM
- LMS
- Group Projects/Assignments
- Writing, Acting, and Public Speaking
4. FLEXIBILITY & ADAPTABILITY
- LMS
- Student Choice
- Modeling
5. INITIATIVE & SELF-DIRECTION
- LMS
- Student Choice
- 20 Time
6. SOCIAL & CROSS-CULTURAL SKILLS
- Character Counts Lessons
- Groups
- Events
- Literature
- Field Trips
7. PRODUCTIVITY & ACCOUNTABILITY
- Standards-Based Grading
- NWEA
- LMS
8. LEADERSHIP & RESPONSIBILITY
- Student Council
- Events: Quiz Bowl, Spelling Bee, Poetry Slam
- Enrichments
- Charity
- PBIS
- Focus on outcomes
- Develop reciprocal trust
- Challenge the status quo
- Be inspiring
- Active
- Collaborative
- Constructive
- Authentic
- Goal-Directed
At the Transformation level:
1. Students use technology tools flexibly to achieve specific learning outcomes.
2. Students have a conceptual understanding of the tools coupled with extensive practical knowledge about their use.
3. Students apply that understanding and knowledge, and students may extend the use of technology tools.
4. They are encouraged to use technology tools in unconventional ways and are self-directed in combining the use of various tools.
5. The teacher serves as a guide, mentor, and model in the use of technology.
6. Technology tools are often used to facilitate higher order learning activities that would not otherwise have been possible or would have been difficult to accomplish without the use of technology.
This framework is entirely based on the work of others and is just one of the many ways to look at understanding and trying to measure innovation.
First, the title of your blog is amazing!
ReplyDeleteSecond, what a difficult concept. We are teaching toward the future. Teaching into the unknown. And then we have to measure it? Ah, very frustrating thought even for this scientist. I too look forward to engaging in this concept behind measurement of innovative teaching.
Thanks for the feedback and read!
Delete